4 Big Intelligence Stories You Missed Amid The Comey Headlines This Week:

4 Big Intelligence Stories You Missed Amid The Comey Headlines This Week:

Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe (from left), Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Pompeo, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers, Defense Intelligence Agency Director Vincent Stewart and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Director Robert Cardillo testifiy before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

This week’s spectacle over the leadership of the FBI got all the headlines, but there’s always a lot more taking place beneath the surface in the shadowy world of the intelligence community, or “IC.”

Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe was only one of a full slate of witnesses who appeared Thursday before the Senate Intelligence Committee to discuss the range of worldwide threats arrayed against the United States.

The bad news is: There’s a lot of them.

Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats listed item after item in page after page of his opening statement, ranging from the threat of artificially intelligent technologies being compromised by cyberattacks to the danger from counter-space weapons launched against American satellites to the risks involved with the spread of Zika.

“The complexity of the threat environment is ever expanding,” Coats said. “This has challenged the IC to stay ahead of the adversary and it has not been an easy task.”

And there’s more going on in America’s spy agencies beyond the tracking of “threats” or their other tasks overseas. There are important storylines about the way they work inside Washington and even inside the Capitol itself. Here’s a look at some of the biggest.

Kim Jong Un Is An ‘Existential’ Threat To U.S.

In terms of foreign dangers to the United States, Coats and his fellow spymasters were clear that North Korea tops the list.

“This is a very significant, potentially existential threat to the United States that has to be addressed,” Coats said.

Scientists loyal to North Korean strongman Kim Jong Un are making progress in miniaturizing nuclear warheads that could fit atop potential new ballistic missiles with enough range to hit the United States, the intelligence bosses warned — although under questioning from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., they stopped short of revealing precisely when they believe that could happen.

“What we’ve not seen them do is do a complete end-to-end test of an [intercontinental ballistic missile] with a nuclear device,” said Lt. Gen. Vincent Stewart, head of the military-focused Defense Intelligence Agency.

Even so, he said, “they’re going to put those two together at some point … they’re on that path and they’re committed to doing that.”

CIA Director Mike Pompeo told senators that his agency was working more closely with South Korea, a treaty ally that hosts some 30,000 American troops and their families, to try to step up the work to slow down or put pressure on the North.

But Robert Cardillo, director of the spy satellite and mapping-focused National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, suggested that the competition with the North might wind up close to a photo finish.

“They are in a race,” he said. “[Kim] is pushing very hard on the accelerator here. This whole panel is well aware of that and we are doing everything in our power to make sure that we give you and our customers the advantage to win that race.”

Dial 702 For Snooping

Washington’s intelligence bosses weren’t just reporting in on Thursday. They also were on Capitol Hill to do a bit of lobbying for a favorite bill — known in the IC as Section 702 — that authorizes them to monitor some Americans’ communications without a warrant.

Traditionally it took permission from a judge before American spies could surveil a “U.S. Person,” but since 2008, Congress has permitted such monitoring to continue if an American communicates with a foreigner overseas who is already a target of lawful intelligence-gathering.

The spy agencies are supposed to “minimize” details about people swept up in what they call such “incidental collection,” and they say their practices are regularly vetted by Congress and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

This year’s imbroglio over the firing of former national security adviser Michael Flynn has brought a spotlight back on these practices, even if conversations between Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak might not have been intercepted under this provision in the law. So as elements of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendments Act are due to sunset this year, critics in both parties want to use the threat of holding it up to get concessions.

Republicans say the leaking of details about Flynn and Kislyak show how easy it is for national security officials to abuse their powers — then-national security adviser Susan Rice, it has emerged, asked for the names of President Trump’s associates to be “unmasked” as she reviewed intelligence collected before the inauguration. At about the same time, someone gave The Washington Post details about Flynn’s conversation even though his identity and those details are supposed to be a closely guarded secret.

Key Players And Concepts In Thursday’s Hearing

A look at 10 people and three concepts pivotal to a Senate Intelligence Committee oversight hearing.

Andrew McCabe

Acting director of the FBI

Unexpectedly yanked into the spotlight after Comey firing

An FBI special agent since 1996, serving in the New York Field Office, the Counterterrorism Division and elsewhere. Became deputy director last year; now acting director after President Trump’s surprise dismissal of James Comey. Helming FBI’s Russia investigation but not expected to serve long, with Republicans citing McCabe’s wife’s political aspirations as a Democrat and ties to Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe. Attorney General Jeff Sessions searching for another interim FBI director.

James Comey

Former director of the FBI

Previously at the center of Trump, Clinton investigations; fired by Trump

Longtime Justice Department attorney and official; FBI director from 2013 until May 9, 2017, when he was abruptly dismissed. Investigated both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump; blamed by Democrats for costing Clinton the presidency after a key statement about the email inquiry less than two weeks before Election Day. Acknowledged the FBI has been conducting a Trump counterintelligence investigation since July 2016 but tight-lipped about its focus, people interviewed or implications.

Richard Burr

North Carolina Republican senator

Trump ally leading probe into potential ties with Russia

Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee; campaign and transition ally of Donald Trump. Reportedly asked by the White House to help knock down stories about potential connections between Trump aides and Russia; has vowed to pursue a fair and complete investigation about the 2016 election meddling wherever it leads. Denied there was any evidence to support the president’s claim of Obama-era “wiretapping” of Trump Tower.

Mark Warner

Virginia Democratic senator

Described “a lot of smoke” from Trump, Russia; searching for fire

Vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee; has described the investigation into 2016 election meddling as possibly “the most important thing I’ve ever done.” Told NPR he was pleased about progress of investigation but later reportedly frustrated with lack of staff and lack of coordination with Republican majority on committee. Home-state CIA, Pentagon and defense industry are influential constituents.

Mike Rogers

Director of the National Security Agency

Spy world’s chief electronic snoop and cyber boss

Runs vast spy agency that monitors electronic communications around the world. Top Pentagon cyber officer. Interviewed with Donald Trump for an administration role but stayed as boss of NSA. Was among key intelligence agency leaders who concluded Russia not only meddled in the election but also did so to hurt Hillary Clinton and help Trump. Warned Congress that it’s “impossible to overstate the breadth and scale of malicious cyberactivity occurring today.”

Dan Coats

Director of national intelligence

Top U.S. spymaster; under pressure over surveillance of Americans

Longtime Washington operative who served in the Senate from Indiana and as an ambassador; now nominal boss of the 17 agencies in the U.S. intelligence community. Reportedly irked by mild White House support, delays in confirmation and nomination and the potential threat of an outsider being tasked to “review” the intelligence agencies. Pressed by critics to reveal the number of Americans swept up in “incidental collection” as U.S. spies monitor targets overseas.

Mike Pompeo

Director of the CIA

Trump ally who has slammed WikiLeaks over Russian connection

Former Republican member of Congress from Kansas; now a powerful but mostly hidden operator within the intelligence community. Made an about-face both personally and on behalf of the Trump administration with a speech that excoriated WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, over Russia’s use of them to fence secrets obtained from the U.S. and its spy agencies. As a lawmaker, heavily critical of the Obama-era Iran nuclear deal.

Section 702

Key portion of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendments Act

Controversial snooping law due to expire this year

Authorizes American intelligence to target the communications of non-U.S. persons outside the U.S., even if they’re talking with Americans, without a warrant. Requires agencies to “minimize” details about such “incidentally” surveilled Americans, but some key officials can ask for details to be “unmasked.” The law is set to expire this year, amid renewed debate about whether Congress should permit the practice to continue.

Sally Yates

Former acting U.S. attorney general

Warned White House about Flynn; fired by Trump over travel ban

Long-serving prosecutor and Justice Department official; appointed by President Barack Obama but wound up as acting attorney general under President Trump before he nominated Jeff Sessions. Warned White House that Michael Flynn had not told the truth about his discussion with the Russian ambassador, that the Russians knew and that Flynn could be vulnerable to blackmail. Fired by Trump over failing to defend in court his desired ban on travel from some mostly Muslim countries.

Michael Flynn

Former Trump national security adviser

Resigned after misleading White House about contacts with Russian ambassador

Retired three-star Army general; former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency; close campaign national security aide to President Trump. Talked with Russian ambassador following election and may have offered accommodations on sanctions or other punishment imposed by President Barack Obama following Moscow’s election mischief; quit after misleading Vice President Pence about talks with the Russians. Has offered to testify to Congress in exchange for immunity from prosecution.

Susan Rice

Former Obama U.N. ambassador and national security adviser

Accused of improperly “unmasking” intelligence

A long-standing target of Republican ire over role in announcing 2012 Benghazi attack. Accused by White House officials – who released information via House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes – of improperly “unmasking” names of Trump aides swept up in “incidental collection” during transition. Rice denies any improper action or leaks to press.

‘Unmasking’

U.S. intelligence community practice

Enables top leaders to see identities of Americans caught up in surveillance

Spy agencies conceal the names of Americans in their reports who have been “incidentally” overheard or mentioned during surveillance of foreign targets. But some top officials, like the national security adviser or the FBI director, can ask an agency that has provided intelligence (for example, the National Security Agency) to “unmask” those details if they want to understand more or believe there’s evidence of a crime. An Obama-era official may have done so and leaked Michael Flynn’s name to The Washington Post.

‘Incidental collection’

U.S. intelligence community practice

Surveillance of Americans who are not the targets of foreign collection

U.S. intelligence agencies need a warrant to spy on Americans, but not foreigners overseas. When an American communicates with a foreign target, Congress permits the spying to go on, so long as information about the “U.S. Person” is “minimized.” Trump and his aides may have been caught up in this “incidental collection” before the inauguration.

Key civil libertarians, on the other hand, including both Republicans and Democrats, argue there’s nothing “incidental” about this collection — that the U.S. government is probably snooping on millions of innocent Americans talking lawfully with people overseas.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., on Thursday renewed a demand that Coats provide a public estimate of the people involved with this “incidental collection” — one he said the intelligence community has been stonewalling for years.

“We have to have that number,” Wyden said. “Are we going to get it? Are we going to get it in time so we can have a debate that shows that those of us who understand there are threats coming from overseas, and we support the effort to deal with those threats as part of 702? That we are not going to have American’s privacy rights indiscriminately swept up?”

Coats promised he would respond but said the issue is technically complicated and investigating it might involve an active breach of Americans’ privacy. He and National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers insisted that no matter how the debate in Congress goes, they must continue to have Section 702.

“If we were to lose 702’s authorities, we would be significantly degraded in our ability to provide timely warning and insight as to what terrorist actors, nation states, criminal elements are doing that is of concern to our nation as well as our friends and allies,” he said.

What’s more, Rogers added, much of what the intelligence community learned about last year’s Russian meddling in the presidential election “was informed by knowledge we gained through” that power.

The Kaspersky Conundrum

The cyber-frustrations of members of Congress and their witnesses are a frequent feature of Intelligence and Armed Services Committee hearings and other national security hearings on the Hill. They seldom, however, get more specific than broad statements and almost never involve the name of a specific problem or company. On Thursday, however, two senators mentioned one in particular: Kaspersky Labs.

The Russian company — which supports NPR and is a provider of security services for its IT systems — has been linked to work for Russia’s intelligence agencies. The leaders of the House Oversight Committee released documents showing payments by Kaspersky to Flynn. Even so, millions of Americans use Kaspersky software, as Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., pointed out to the witnesses — but, he asked, would they run it on their systems?

Here’s how they answered:

McCabe, of the FBI: “A resounding no from me.”

Pompeo, of the CIA: “No.”

Coats, the director of national intelligence: “No, senator.”

Rogers, of the NSA: “No, sir.”

Stewart, of the Pentagon’s DIA: “No, senator.”

Cardillo, of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency: “No, sir.”

Later, Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., asked the intelligence bosses about Kaspersky again. They repeated their own government systems were safe from any danger, but the DIA’s Stewart said he couldn’t be sure about all of his contractors. Intelligence and defense contractors have been the sources for huge leaks of secrets from the NSA, CIA and other agencies.

Coats Takes Control

Intelligence officers often lament that their greatest exploits may never be known but their worst failures are often front-page headlines. The CIA, FBI and NSA especially have been in a constant state of reinvention since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, then the botched case for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and the exposure of many secrets by former contractor Edward Snowden.

Congress and the intelligence agencies have tried after each of these and other big defeats to remake themselves; one result was the creation of Coats’ job trying to herd the cats of the 16 other entities that make up what insiders call “the IC.”

There’s been tension between the community and President Trump since before his inauguration, when he has both accepted and rejected its conclusion that Russia meddled in the election that put him into office. And Trump later infuriated many CIA officers by using the agency’s memorial wall as the backdrop for an early post-inauguration stump speech.

So between the never-finished work of remaking and reshaping the IC and Trump’s personal animus after the election, it appeared he might set to work early with a wrecking ball: The New York Times reported in February that Trump planned to bring in billionaire Stephen Feinberg to do an outside review of the intelligence agencies, something that chilled insiders and irked Coats, who had not yet been confirmed.

Since then, however, the situation has gotten better, Coats told senators. He and his agency leaders are frequent guests for long meetings at the White House with Trump, he said. And although there will still be another big review of the IC at the 10-year mark since the big post-Iraq reforms, Coats said he will be driving the train.

The inquiry, he said, will look into “how we can make our process even more streamlined, more efficient and more effective. My office is proud to lead this review.”

BY: Philip Ewing

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s