Here’s how Pruitt’s ethics keep coming into question: (As Scott Pruitt faces Congress this week, here’s everything you should know about his ethical transgressions.)

Here’s how Pruitt’s ethics keep coming into question: (As Scott Pruitt faces Congress this week, here’s everything you should know about his ethical transgressions.)

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has been swamped by scandal, from taking first-class flights at taxpayer expense to living in a lobbyist’s condo in D.C.

His long list of ethical transgressions, plus 86 unanswered questions about his tenure [PDF], signal Pruitt’s disregard for ethical standards and his close alliance with industries he is responsible for overseeing.

A rundown of his ongoing scandals

Sweetheart condo deal – Pruitt received a below-market-value housing arrangement from the wife of a prominent energy lobbyist whose clients stood to potentially gain from actions taken by the administrator.

First-class flights – It was revealed that Pruitt often flew first class or charter and military planes at very high cost to taxpayers. Pruitt claimed that harsh public comments required him to fly first class. The EPA Inspector General is investigating. It has since been revealed that Pruitt was willing to fly coach when taxpayers weren’t footing the bill.

Secret phone booth – Pruitt had a secure communications facility installed next to his office for $43,000, despite the fact that EPA already has a secure communications facility on another floor. The EPA Inspector General and the Office of Management and Budget are investigating.

Unauthorized pay raises – EPA awarded two close Pruitt associates exorbitant pay raises despite orders from the White House directing them to not. Pruitt initially claimed he was not aware that the raises were being given, but EPA’s Inspector General says he did [PDF].

Secret schedule – In contrast to long-standing EPA practice, begun by President Reagan’s EPA chief, William Ruckelshaus, Pruitt kept his schedule of events secret until forced to release it. The schedule now is only released retrospectively, with major details redacted.

Insider influence – Following a meeting with Fitzgerald Trucks, EPA created a loophole for the company’s high-polluting trucks. Pruitt met with the American Petroleum Institute as EPA attempted to lift limits on methane pollution from oil and gas operations. Pruitt met with Pebble Limited Partnership, a Canadian mining company, then cleared the way for the company’s mining operation, which threatened Alaskan fishing with pollution. The pattern has been repeated in other cases.

Partisan monitoring of employees – A partisan political firm with an EPA contract to do “media monitoring” investigated the personal political leanings of EPA employees suspected of not supporting the Trump administration.

Special waivers – Two senior Pruitt aides were granted special waivers to work for undisclosed outside clients while continuing to work at the agency. One of the men, John Konkus, is known for describing climate change as “the double c-word.” Pruitt lieutenants also sidestep waivers: Pruitt used a loophole in the Safe Drinking Water Act to bring in Nancy Beck from the chemical industry’s lobbying arm to run the Office of Chemical Safety. The loophole made sure that Beck wouldn’t be subject to the Trump administration’s ethics pledge.

Won’t be questioned – At least five officials, four of them senior, werereassigned or demoted, or requested new jobs after they questioned Pruitt’s spending habits and his use of taxpayer money for first-class airfare.

A history of corruption

While in Oklahoma, Pruitt and four associates used a shell company to purchase a home from an Oklahoma lobbyist whose employer regularly had business before state lawmakers. Pruitt was never listed as a part of the shell company and made no mention of the property or shell company in campaign filings.

Pruitt would go on to vote and act favorably in the interest of the lobbyist’s employer, one of many examples of a troubling trend of rewarding entities with which he had past dealings.

From: The Environmental Defense Fund

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s