Trump to Montenegro- Drop Dead:

Trump to Montenegro- Drop Dead:

The president, willfully ignorant of the nation’s commitments under NATO, dismisses tiny Montenegro as not worth defending. Smirk on, Mr. Putin.

This has been the Trump trip that keeps on giving. There hardly seemed more damage he could do after he declared the European Union a “foe,” insulted Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain, railed at NATO, upstaged Queen Elizabeth II and gave that infamous news conference with President Vladimir Putin of Russia. Yet then, for good measure, came his weird suggestion that Montenegro’s 640,000 souls are “very aggressive” and could drag NATO into World War III.

In the context of an obsequious interview by the Fox News host Tucker Carlson, taped in Helsinki, Finland, on Monday and aired on Tuesday evening, it appeared almost as an aside in President Trump’s standard rants about trade, migrants, Hillary Clinton’s computer servers, the perfidy of the F.B.I. or NATO’s penury. Yet like so many of Mr. Trump’s unscripted comments, it revealed another facet of his ignorance of and disdain for America’s historic place in the world and its alliances, or of the power of a presidential pronouncement.

After drawing Mr. Trump into the usual tirade on how the NATO allies were getting a free ride while ripping off the United States in trade, Mr. Carlson moved to his next prompt: “So, let’s say Montenegro, which joined last year, is attacked. Why should my son go to Montenegro to defend it from attack? Why is that?”

“I understand what you’re saying,” Mr. Trump responded. “I’ve asked the same question.” “Tiny” Montenegro, he continued, has “very aggressive people. They may get aggressive and congratulations, you’re in World War III.”

He then segued to a claim that he had already “raised” an additional $44 billion from NATO members and there was more to come, followed by a riff on how immigration was “destroying the culture of Europe.”

The answer to Mr. Carlson’s and Mr. Trump’s question on why defend Montenegro from attack is, of course, Article 5 of the NATO treaty, the central tenet that requires every member to come to the aid of any ally under attack. That does not mean NATO would have to pile in if Montenegro aggressively assaulted, say, Serbia, since the article is triggered only if a member is attacked. It has been invoked only once: not in the Balkans, but in support of the United States after 9/11.

The broader question, whether NATO is needed any longer in the post-Communist world, has been extensively debated over the past quarter century and answered in the affirmative, as a model of collective security and as a trans-Atlantic bond. It is clear that Mr. Trump, in his zero-sum view of global forces, knows nothing of this history or debate. A larger question is whether he is aware that his friend Mr. Putin strenuously opposed Montenegro’s joining NATO, and that Russia is suspected of being behind a failed 2016 plot to overthrow its government and assassinate its prime minister.

In any case, the response from Montenegro was, indeed, aggressive. “He’s the strangest president in the history of the United States,” Ranko Krivokapic, a former president of the Montenegro Parliament, told the BBC. Reactions at home were less generous. “It is not just that the president throws Montenegro under the bus; he makes the U.S. commitment to NATO conditional and makes clear his discomfort w/Article 5 and collective security, the core of the alliance,” tweeted Richard Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations. Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican, wrote on Twitter, “By attacking Montenegro & questioning our obligations under NATO, the President is playing right into Putin’s hands.”

Mr. Trump might get his staff to find another missing double negative to roll back what he said. A far better job for his people would be to compel him to understand that petty and uninformed whims from his high office are incomparably more dangerous to America’s security, and the world’s, than to a tiny Balkan country.

By The Editorial Board

 The New York Times

The editorial board represents the opinions of the board, its editor and the publisher. It is separate from the newsroom and the Op-Ed section.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s